Skip to content

John Adams (Hillsboro prisoner)

Released
Full name:John Adams
Era:1930s
State:Illinois
Support
John Adams (Hillsboro prisoner)

Biography

John Adams was one of the unemployed demonstrators detained at Hillsboro, Illinois in1934. A June27 letter by Mrs.FrankPrickett, published in the Daily Worker of July5, names Adams while describing censorship of the prisoners’ correspondence and improved food following their hunger strike. The report does not establish his exact arrest day, release or disposition. This record is distinct from the Pennsylvania sedition defendant of the same name.

An official Chicago District International Labor Defense statement in the January 24, 1935 Daily Worker, page 5, individually names John Adams and Jan Wittenberg as the two Hillsboro defendants from outside Montgomery County. It says the fourteen defendants jointly accepted a settlement dropping the treason charge and providing nine months of parole on a plea of not guilty. Proposals to imprison five defendants for one year, or to jail only Adams and Wittenberg, were rejected; the twelve local defendants insisted that all should be free or none. This is the defense organization’s attributed account, not proof that either rejected prison term was imposed. The companion Wittenber record preserves a conflicting characterization of the plea as a stipulation to guilt; this source disagreement is not resolved by assumption. No precise physical release day or completed imprisonment total is inferred. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1935/v12-n021-Nat-jan-24-1935-DW-LOC.pdf#page=5.

The December 1, 1934 Daily Worker, page 3 individually identifies this Hillsboro defendant in the caption accompanying the unemployed-worker prosecution report. The December 4 issue, page 1 reports all fifteen defendants pleaded not guilty on December 3 and trial was postponed to December 7 before Judge McWilliams. This is an interim procedural plea, not a replacement for any later settlement or plea. Sources: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1934/v11-n287-Nat-dec-01-DW-LOC.pdf#page=3 ; https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1934/v11-n289-Nat-dec-04-DW-LOC.pdf#page=1

A July 6 letter from Mrs. John Adams says her husband was arrested as he got off a bus in an adjoining county. The July 11 poetry page expressly captions John Adams as one of the eleven unemployed workers imprisoned at Hillsboro. These sources add arrest circumstances and his prison writing without establishing an exact arrest day or merging him with the Pennsylvania sedition defendant. Daily Worker, July 11, 1934, page 4. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1934/v11-n165-jul-11-1934-DW-LOC.pdf#page=4

The page-3 letter signed John Adams on behalf of the Hillsboro prisoners credits protest publicity with reducing lynching danger and support during their hunger strike. The institutional and cohort context connects the signature to the Hillsboro record, separate from Pennsylvania's John Adams. The August 9 grand-jury development on page 1 supplies collective case context, without individual new sentence or release. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1934/v11-n192-aug-11-1934-DW-LOC.pdf

The Journal-News retrospective of July 1, 2019, printed page 7A, names this person among fourteen arrested Hillsboro defendants and describes the January 7, 1935 negotiated disposition: all fourteen stipulated to guilt on the lesser charge of conspiracy to do an illegal act and were placed on nine months of parole. The original Illinois 1919 syndicalism indictment alleged advocacy of violence by speech and writing, without charging specific violent acts. George Hall prosecuted; Judge Paul McWilliams heard the December 1934 proceedings after transfer from T. M. Jett. Pretrial bail must be distinguished from the January parole disposition, which does not itself prove uninterrupted jail custody through January 7. The retrospective summarizes the arrests as June 1934; existing individual May/August chronologies are not overwritten. Source: https://cdn1.creativecirclemedia.com/journalnews/files/20190630-202614-HJN%207-1-19.pdf#page=7

Page 5's Chicago Artist Faces Lynch Terror column identifies the Hillsboro co-defendant of Jan Wittenber as John Adams of the New Masses, held under Illinois criminal-syndicalism legislation. The cohort and location identify this Hillsboro record, separate from Pennsylvania's John Adams. The article's specific open-court beating allegation concerns Wittenber and is not automatically assigned to Adams; no exact arrest or release day is supplied. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1934/v11-n161-jul-06-1934-DW-LOC.pdf

Page 7's bail appeal individually identifies the Chicago Marine Workers Industrial Union member John Adams as still jailed at Hillsboro under $2,000 cash bail. This is a continuing-custody observation and appeal for funds, not a completed release, and concerns the Hillsboro prisoner rather than the Pennsylvania sedition defendant. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1934/v11-n198-aug-18-1934-DW-LOC.pdf

PercyShostac individually identifies Adams among eleven Hillsboro unemployed-council leaders arrested June3,1934 by SheriffSaathoff. They were held without indictment, initially8000dollars bail each, then5000cash after protest. Their six-day hunger strike won better food, visits and censored correspondence after incommunicado detention. The narrative identifies Adams as a Chicago-based MarineWorkersIndustrialUnion organizer who accompanied Shostac to Hillsboro and TaylorSprings in May. This is distinct from the Pennsylvania sedition defendant JohnAdams. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/new-masses/1934/v12n03-jul-17-1934-NM.pdf#page=29

Labor Defender, February 1935, PDF page 9: Jan Wittenber’s first-person Hillsboro account says defendants rejected proposed one-year, ninety-day and other jail compromises. They ultimately accepted quashing treason and conspiracy indictments, a not-guilty plea and nine months suspended to Vandalia farm with monthly parole reports; all fourteen were free when written. The suspended term is not time served. January 7 is the scheduled trial/conference day; no separate imprisonment is inferred. Jurkanin is explicitly identified as the Socialist defendant. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/labordefender/1935/v11n02-feb-1935-orig-LD.pdf#page=9

The first-person Hillsboro account is signed John Adams, one of the fourteen held for treason. It supplies the Illinois sedition-law characterization and states the group already won bail. The author is matched to the Hillsboro event-qualified prisoner, not the unrelated Pennsylvania sedition defendant with the same name.

Labor Defender, October 1934, PDF page 17.

Daily Worker, July 6, 1934; relevant page stated in the accompanying profile note.

Daily Worker, August 18, 1934; relevant page stated in the accompanying profile note.

Case

Charges: Illinois sedition-law prosecution arising from unemployed and relief organizing; Hillsboro fourteen case.
Sentence: The October 1934 first-person account identifies Adams among the fourteen defendants actually freed on bail before the planned October trial. Sedition is the prosecutor’s political allegation; the announced trial and proposed self-defense are not a completed verdict, prison term or physical release day. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/labordefender/1934/v10n09-oct-1934-orig-LD.pdf#page=17 Nine months parole under the January 7, 1935 settlement; pretrial arrest documented, but no uninterrupted completed jail duration established. Source: https://cdn1.creativecirclemedia.com/journalnews/files/20190630-202614-HJN%207-1-19.pdf#page=7
Prosecutor: George Hall
Judge: Thomas M. Jett; transferred to Paul McWilliams for December 1934 proceedings.
Convicted: Yes