Skip to content

Forrest Gustave

Era:1970s
State:Missouri
Support
No image available

Biography

Forrest Gustave was a federal prisoner confined in the START behavior-modification program at the U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri. A 1973 prisoner letter named him among six men resisting the program. He also challenged the involuntary confinement in federal court; in 1974 the court ruled that forcible START transfers without minimum hearing procedures violated the Fifth Amendment right to due process.

Forrest Gustave was a federal prisoner confined in the START behavior-modification program at the U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri. A 1973 prisoner letter named him among six men resisting the program. He also challenged the involuntary confinement in federal court; in 1974 the court ruled that forcible START transfers without minimum hearing procedures violated the Fifth Amendment right to due process. Historical confinement in START, rather than a separate criminal sentence. The Daily Rag letter describes collective noncooperation and alleges harsh confinement and reprisals. These allegations are attributed to the prisoners. In Clonce v. Richardson, 379 F. Supp. 338 (W.D. Mo., July 31, 1974), the court granted declaratory relief on the due-process claim; other claims were dismissed as moot after the program ended. Program termination involved return to the original prisons, not release from custody. Individual transfer dates, release dates, underlying convictions, and actual total time served are not established here.

The Daily Rag, September 1973, PDF page 5.

Clonce v. Richardson, 379 F. Supp. 338 (1974).

In a June 1974 letter, Gustave reported his return from Springfield to Leavenworth after resisting START. He said lawyers obtained a thirty-day general-population placement instead of further isolation; this was a prison placement, not discharge.

Federal Judicial Center, registry 2778, pages 22.

Case

U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners, Springfield
Sentence: Historical confinement in START, rather than a separate criminal sentence. The Daily Rag letter describes collective noncooperation and alleges harsh confinement and reprisals. These allegations are attributed to the prisoners. In Clonce v. Richardson, 379 F. Supp. 338 (W.D. Mo., July 31, 1974), the court granted declaratory relief on the due-process claim; other claims were dismissed as moot after the program ended. Program termination involved return to the original prisons, not release from custody. Individual transfer dates, release dates, underlying convictions, and actual total time served are not established here.
Institution State: Missouri