Biography
Earl King was secretary of the Marine Firemen's Union and a defendant in the Point Lobos murder case. Arrested in San Francisco on August 27, 1936, he was prosecuted over the death of chief engineer George Alberts aboard the freighter at Alameda. The prosecution did not allege that King had been aboard the ship; its case relied heavily on fellow seaman George Wallace's testimony. King, Ernest Ramsay and Frank Conner were convicted of second-degree murder on January 5, 1937, and sent to San Quentin. Union supporters campaigned for their freedom and challenged the prosecution as an attack on maritime organizing. King was paroled in November 1941.
The Daily Worker of November12,1936,page3, reports that defense attorneys for King,Ramsay and Conner sought to disqualify Superior Judge Frank M.Ogden, a former member of the district attorney’s office. The defense accused that office of trying to stack the jury by postponing other Alameda County jury cases until the maritime defendants had been tried. The report states that the unionists’ trial could not begin until a jury was selected.
The Point Lobos defense account names this seaman in the Alameda murder prosecution and alleges isolation from chosen counsel during the investigation. It discusses chief engineer Alberts’s March 22, 1936 death and disputes the prosecution. These are attributed pretrial claims; later verdicts and prison-release dates remain unchanged. Labor Defender, December 1936, original PDF page 18. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/labordefender/1936/v12-%5B10%5Dn11-dec-1936-orig-LD.pdf#page=18
Socialist Call, January 16, 1937, page 3: A Federated Press Oakland report names King, Ramsay and Conner as convicted of second-degree murder in the March 22, 1936 killing of Point Lobos chief engineer George W. Alberts. It reports a verdict after four hours of jury deliberation, alleges exclusion of union members from a conservative jury, and presents the prosecution as a frame-up timed to discredit the maritime strike. These characterizations remain attributed. The item describes possible imprisonment up to life without supplying an individualized final sentence or actual service total; it does not replace separately established verdict, sentence or release dates. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/socialist-call/call%202-96.pdf
Voice of the Federation, December 21, 1940, regular pages 8 and Christmas supplement pages 1, 3–4 (PDF pages 8–9, 11–12): The defense edition explicitly reports King, Ramsay and Conner still in San Quentin during their fourth prison Christmas. It says the California parole board fixed their terms at twenty years on March 26, 1940, after delay, and that Governor Culbert Olson had visited them several weeks before publication; the pardon request remained pending and a hearing was to precede action. The twenty years is the board-fixed term, not time actually served, and the reported four years is approximate elapsed confinement through this issue. It reports King rejecting Stanley M. (Larry) Doyle's offer of freedom for testimony against Bridges and describes a February 1938 proposal by immigration representative Shearer to King's lawyer brother Garfield King. It also reproduces a separately captioned photograph of Earl King at a ship's wheel in 1918. The illustrated group on PDF page 9 is explicitly labeled left to right Ernest Ramsay, Frank Conner, Earl King. Existing identified portraits were preserved. Allegations about the prosecution, paid witnesses, jury selection and bribe attempts are attributed to this union defense publication. Source: https://archive.ilwu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/19401221.pdf
National Guardian, October 19, 1953, national page 13: A critical retrospective on Earl Warren names King, Ramsay and Conner in the Point Lobos prosecution and reports parole after about five years. It alleges a paid witness, perjured testimony and suppressed evidence; those characterizations remain attributed to the paper. It also recalls King and Ramsay rejecting an immigration-service offer of freedom in exchange for affidavits against Harry Bridges. The article reports Conner then in a mental home and attributes his ill health to prison; it supplies no admission date or evidence of compulsory psychiatric confinement. No exact release date or new custody interval is inferred. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/national-guardian/1953-10-19-5-52-nat-guardian.pdf
Voice of the Federation, July 6, 1940, pages 3, 6–8, documents the King–Ramsay–Conner defense campaign during continuing San Quentin imprisonment. Page 6 prints Ramsay's signed June 26 letter from San Quentin, Box 59815, to Miriam Dinkin, protesting demoralizing communications about supposed lack of union support. The committee cites a coastwide one-hour stoppage, petitions and contributions and says Governor Olson's pardon decision remained forthcoming. Page 7 prints Seattle attorney Lady Willie Forbus's appeal and identifies the reported fixed twenty-year terms; this is imposed sentence, not service. She describes King's democratic union work and his Canadian family connections and attributes innocence arguments to her assessment. Page 8 reports the SS Red Jacket crew's pardon telegram from Callao and the President Cleveland crew's telegram receiving only an assurance of consideration from Lieutenant Governor Patterson. These are pending pardon demands, not completed pardons or release. Page 3 says the committee supplied each man's limited permitted monthly prison spending and discouraged unnecessary family-directed contributions; the collectively mentioned recent marriage is not assigned to a particular prisoner. Source: https://archive.ilwu.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/19400706.pdf
The October 1936 editorial records a King-Ramsey-Conner United Defense Committee of numerous unions, supported by the Seattle Central Labor Council and headquartered at 112 Market Street, San Francisco. It alleges that the murder prosecution and planted informants’ testimony were intended to disrupt negotiations for new maritime union contracts. The claim remains attributed defense advocacy, not a judicial finding of fabrication or another arrest. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/labordefender/1936/v12-%5B10%5Dn10-oct-1936-orig-LD.pdf#page=4
The Seattle report describes ten-cent Christmas cards distributed with Adrian Coogan’s King–Ramsay–Conner Defense Committee to fund the release campaign. Vic Johnson’s holiday column on PDF page 5 places the three in San Quentin, and page 8 discusses a Honolulu defense-fund controversy. These are contemporaneous continued-custody and defense reports, without a new sentence or physical release date.
The San Pedro convention report condemns the attempted San Francisco grand-jury frame-up of Earl King and A. M. Murphy, progressive Marine Firemen and Oilers officials. The brief report supplies no new charge, arrest day or disposition and is retained as attributed union response.
Miriam Allen deFord’s September 16 Oakland report describes the pending Alberts murder prosecution and a joint defense committee formed by fifteen San Francisco unions. It quotes the maritime federation and Harry Bridges alleging a frame-up, and defense lawyer George R. Andersen alleging coerced confessions and political ambition by District Attorney Earl Warren. These are attributed defense allegations, not adjudicated findings. The Labor Council demanded an impartial trial and the federation sought a congressional investigation; no new arrest, conviction or release is reported.
Socialist Call, January 16, 1937; relevant page stated in the accompanying profile note.
Voice of the Federation, July 6, 1940; relevant page stated in the accompanying profile note.
Page 1’s August 30 San Francisco dispatch reports King and assistant secretary A. M. Murphy arrested yesterday over the previous March death of engineer Alberts at Point Lobos. That relative wording implies August29, conflicting with the existing August27 arrest date; the latter is not overwritten. The report links the defense’s frame-up claim to shipowners’ demands for arbitration, union hiring halls and overtime concessions. The alleged motive is attributed labor-defense analysis, not a judicial finding or another arrest.
Page2’s prisoner address list places this person at San Quentin, prisoner number 59815. This is contemporary location and correspondence evidence, not a new sentence or exact transfer date.
The imprisoned writer Donald N. Brown refers to a reported or scheduled September 7, 1938 oral argument in King, Ramsay and Conner’s appeal and hopes the appeal will be granted. His letter shifts from future to past tense about the argument and does not independently verify that the hearing occurred or establish its outcome. The page 3 letter concerning defense finances likewise describes the men’s ongoing case. These are contemporary defense and procedural reports, not a granted appeal, new conviction, pardon or physical release.
The union history describes the Point Lobos prosecution, naming Earl Warren as prosecutor and the three men in a courtroom photograph (PDF 37). It dates the second-degree-murder verdict January 5, 1937; any conflict with established court chronology is retained rather than silently overwriting dates. The account reports San Quentin confinement, alleges coerced confession and irregular evidence, and discusses later pardons. It does not supply a new exact physical release day. For Ramsay it distinguishes later deportation proceedings and a further Warren pardon; for Conner it describes psychiatric institutionalization after prison without usable dates.
