Skip to content

Clyde Kennard

Era:1960s
State:Mississippi
Support
No image available

Biography

Clyde Kennard was the subject of a SNCC campaign demanding his release from Parchman after his efforts to enter the segregated Mississippi Southern College. The December 19, 1962 Student Voice describes him as an individually imprisoned chicken farmer, reports a seven-year sentence as an accessory in a chicken-feed theft prosecution, and says he had been imprisoned for about two years. That is a historical custody snapshot, not a precise admission date, completed total or current custody claim. The report also describes a separate 1959 reckless-driving arrest and fine after an application for admission, but supplies no custody endpoints for that earlier encounter.

Contemporary SNCC custody report

Clyde Kennard was the subject of a SNCC campaign demanding his release from Parchman after his efforts to enter the segregated Mississippi Southern College. The December 19, 1962 Student Voice describes him as an individually imprisoned chicken farmer, reports a seven-year sentence as an accessory in a chicken-feed theft prosecution, and says he had been imprisoned for about two years. That is a historical custody snapshot, not a precise admission date, completed total or current custody claim. The report also describes a separate 1959 reckless-driving arrest and fine after an application for admission, but supplies no custody endpoints for that earlier encounter.

Individual physical custody is established by the report; warrant, offense, arrest, trial and release dates are not interchangeable. Unnamed demonstrators are not assigned this person’s custody history. No race, gender, date of birth, age, portrait or organizational taxonomy value is inferred from a name, appearance or membership. The historical account is not a claim of present-day detention.

The Student Voice, volume 3 number 4, December 19, 1962, original pages 1, 4.

Case

Charges: Accessory to theft
Sentence: Seven-year imposed sentence in the chicken-feed theft prosecution; actual Parchman custody is individually confirmed by the December 19, 1962 report, which describes approximately two years imprisoned at that time. Neither seven nominal years nor the approximate two-year snapshot is converted to a numerical served-day total. September 25, 1960 dates the alleged theft, not a proven arrest, admission or sentencing day. Exact physical admission, later release and completed total remain unknown. Source: https://www.crmvet.org/docs/sv/sv6212.pdf
Convicted: Yes