Biography
Bella Mintz was one of the staff of the communist children's summer camp at Yucaipa, California convicted in 1929 under the state's red-flag law alongside Yetta Stromberg — whose appeal became the landmark Stromberg v. California — and sentenced to a term of six months to five years. In 1929 California prosecuted the young staff of a communist children's summer camp at Yucaipa under the state's red-flag law for a daily ceremony raising a red flag; the raid also turned up radical literature. The defendants were sentenced in October 1929.
Yetta Stromberg’s first-person account in the November 13, 1929 issue describes the Yucaipa camp raid and San Bernardino prosecution, including the arrest of camp leaders and adults volunteering for cooking, washing and cleaning. It reports Sarah Cutler acquitted, while the others faced conspiracy proceedings; Stromberg additionally faced the red-flag count. The article places the trial’s conclusion on October 23 and reports $4,000 bail for the other defendants and $7,500 for Stromberg. The reported indeterminate imposed terms were one to ten years for Stromberg and six months to five years for the others, not completed service. The article’s October 23 verdict wording is not used as a sentencing or prison-admission date; its conflicting Berkowitz chronology is left explicit in the source review. Source: https://www.marxists.org/history/usa/pubs/dailyworker/1929/1929-nat/v06-n214-NAT-nov-13-1929-DW-Q.pdf#page=3
Photograph: Cropped from the original group photograph in Daily Worker, November 15, 1929, page 1. The newspaper caption identifies Bella Mintz at top row, center. The original scanned pixels are preserved without retouching or generated details; the full caption identifies the six Yucaipa defendants by row and position.
Further 1920s custody review: The ACLU April 1930 pamphlet names this defendant among the seven arrested in the August 3, 1929 Yucaipa raid and taken to San Bernardino jail. It records pretrial bail but no exact release day. Custody dates describe the initial jail detention, not admission to San Quentin; release is year-precision only. Source: ACLU, The California Red Flag Case, April 1930, pages 3-6. This more precise account supersedes earlier provisional date notes; year-only release values are not January 1 release dates.
A reported October 10 verdict, before sentencing
The San Bernardino dispatch dated October 11 in the October 12, 1929 Daily Worker reports that six Yucaipa camp defendants were convicted on Thursday and individually names Bella Mintz. That relative date places the reported verdict on October 10, 1929. The same report says sentencing was still conditional on denial of a new-trial motion and describes one-to-ten-year terms only as possible penalties. Its forecast is not a completed sentencing, prison admission or actual time served. The existing initial jail and pretrial-bail record remains intact, with no new custody endpoint or numerical total. This original explicitly prints Bella Mintz; the later October 25 issue’s uncertain Betta/Bella rendering remains a separate textual-identity question, not a newly established alias.
Daily Worker, October 12, 1929, original pages 1. Accounts and allegations are attributed to the newspaper and reported witnesses.
A signed camp account distinguishes charges, bail and nominal terms
A signed account by Yetta Stromberg describes the Yucaipa camp prosecution and its political context. It individually names Bella Mintz among those convicted on the conspiracy charge and reports $4,000 bail and a six-month-to-five-year sentence for that group. This supports a more differentiated contemporary account than the same issue’s broad headline and Fred Beal’s summary of five- and ten-year terms. These are bail amounts and imposed terms, not proof of money posted, actual release, San Quentin admission or completed service. The signed opening says the case concluded on October 23 with conviction, while the earlier October 12 report already recorded here places the verdict on October 10 and the October 25 report dates sentencing to October 23. The later account’s conflation is preserved rather than replacing the existing chronology. Earlier pretrial and appeal bail gaps, physical endpoints and numerical storage remain unchanged. The report’s allegations about political bias and the camp raid remain the named writer’s account.
Daily Worker, November 13, 1929, original pages 1, 3. Statements and allegations remain attributed to the newspaper and named writer.
